Cutis Lux

Omnilux Contour vs Shark CryoGlow

Omnilux Contour and Shark CryoGlow compared on published specifications. Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price. Omnilux Contour: 633 · 830 nm, session 10 min, €453.75. Shark CryoGlow: 415 · 630 · 830 nm, session Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source), US$349.99.

Side by side

Omnilux ContourShark CryoGlow
TypeLEDLED
TechnologyLED light therapy maskLED light therapy mask
Wavelength633 · 830 nm415 · 630 · 830 nm
Reported output≈30 mW/cm²Not found on checked page
Form and coverageFull-face flexible silicone mask, 132 LEDsFull-face rigid shell with under-eye cooling, 160+ LEDs
Session10 minProgramme-dependent (8 min in baseline source)
Schedule (brand)Not found on checked pageNot found on checked page
Reference price€453.75US$349.99
FDA 510(k)K191629
Possible match, unconfirmed
K242796
Record names this device

Key differences

  • Both are LED masks using LED light therapy mask.
  • Wavelengths: Omnilux Contour 633 · 830 nm; Shark CryoGlow 415 · 630 · 830 nm (shared: 830 nm).
  • Sessions: Omnilux Contour 10 min; Shark CryoGlow Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source).
  • Reported output: Omnilux Contour ≈30 mW/cm²; Shark CryoGlow Not found on checked page.
  • Reference price: Omnilux Contour €453.75; Shark CryoGlow US$349.99 (different currencies, not converted).
  • FDA record: Omnilux Contour K191629 (possible match, unconfirmed); Shark CryoGlow K242796 (record names this device).

What the differences mean

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

An LED mask covers the face with many light-emitting diodes. The light is not intended to heat skin. Red and near-infrared light are studied for photobiomodulation, which may increase collagen; 415 nm blue light is studied for acne because it affects acne bacteria.

Omnilux Contour

Omnilux comes from clinical LED therapy: its 633 and 830 nm combination was studied on the Omnilux clinic system in 2005, years before home masks were common, and the Contour Face brings that same pairing into a flexible silicone mask.

Suited to: Wanting the red and near-infrared pairing used in early clinical LED studies; Preferring a simple, focused mask.

Shark CryoGlow

Shark brought mainstream engineering to LED masks: the CryoGlow combines blue, red and near-infrared light with a cooling under-eye panel no other device here offers, and its FDA record names the CryoGlow family directly.

Suited to: Wanting blue, red and near-infrared in one mask; Interest in under-eye cooling.

Research matching both

All LED masks compared

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Omnilux Contour and Shark CryoGlow?

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

Which is cheaper, Omnilux Contour or Shark CryoGlow?

Their reference prices are in different currencies (€453.75 and US$349.99) and we do not convert them. Check current prices on the manufacturer pages.

Which has more research behind it?

Of the studies we explain, 9 match Omnilux Contour’s technology and wavelengths and 11 match Shark CryoGlow’s. Matching studies did not necessarily test these models.