# Cutis Lux > Independent editorial guides to two separate categories of at-home light devices for skin: 5 LED face masks and 5 at-home skin lasers, each compared only within its own category, with 20 plain-English PubMed research summaries. Alphabetical, no rankings, no affiliate links. Specifications are manufacturer claims checked on dated manufacturer pages. ## Categories - [Overview](https://cutislux.com/) - [LED face masks](https://cutislux.com/led-masks/) - [At-home lasers](https://cutislux.com/home-lasers/) - [Do LED masks work? Evidence](https://cutislux.com/led-masks/evidence/) - [LED mask safety](https://cutislux.com/led-masks/safety/) - [Do at-home lasers work? Evidence](https://cutislux.com/home-lasers/evidence/) - [At-home laser safety](https://cutislux.com/home-lasers/safety/) - [FDA 510(k) records](https://cutislux.com/fda-510k-records/) ## LED face masks - [CurrentBody Skin LED Face Mask Series 3](https://cutislux.com/devices/currentbody-series-3/): LED light therapy mask, 415 · 532 · 590 · 633 · 830 · 1072 nm, 10 min, £499.99 - [Dr. Dennis Gross DRx SpectraLite FaceWare Pro](https://cutislux.com/devices/dennis-gross-faceware-pro/): LED light therapy mask, 415 · 630 nm, 3 min, US$455 - [Dr. Renú SpectraLift Advanced](https://cutislux.com/devices/dr-renu-spectralift/): LED light therapy mask, 465 · 530 · 630–660 · 850 nm, 10–15 min, €299 - [Omnilux Contour Face](https://cutislux.com/devices/omnilux-contour/): LED light therapy mask, 633 · 830 nm, 10 min, €453.75 - [Shark CryoGlow FW312](https://cutislux.com/devices/shark-cryoglow/): LED light therapy mask, 415 · 630 · 830 nm, Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source), US$349.99 ## At-home lasers - [LYMA Laser](https://cutislux.com/devices/lyma-laser/): Low-level (“cold”) laser, 808 nm, 3 min per area, £1,999 - [LYMA Laser PRO](https://cutislux.com/devices/lyma-laser-pro/): Low-level (“cold”) laser, 808 nm, 3-min treatment cycle, £4,995 - [MimiSilk Iris 1450nm](https://cutislux.com/devices/mimisilk-iris/): Non-ablative fractional laser, 1450 nm, 5–10 min, €535.95 - [NIRA Pro 3 Laser](https://cutislux.com/devices/nira-pro-3/): Non-fractional diode laser, 1450 nm, 2 min, €792.95 - [Tria FRX Skin Rejuvenating Fractional Laser (2nd Gen)](https://cutislux.com/devices/tria-frx/): Non-ablative fractional laser, 1440 nm, 2–10 min, by setting, US$699.99 ## Research - [Does adding red light to blue help acne at home? A 2026 trial](https://cutislux.com/research/home-red-blue-led-acne-2026-trial/): Open-label randomised controlled trial, 2026, PMID 41886698 - [How safe are 1440 nm non-ablative fractional lasers, including on darker skin?](https://cutislux.com/research/1440-1927-nm-fractional-laser-safety-review/): Literature review, 2025, PMID 41229184 - [Fractional lasers for the eye area worked better after 45](https://cutislux.com/research/fractional-laser-eye-area-age-groups/): Randomised split-face trial, 2025, PMID 40064643 - [A sham-controlled trial of a red LED mask: two sessions a week seemed enough](https://cutislux.com/research/red-led-mask-frequency-sham-trial/): Randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, 2025, PMID 40167796 - [Red and near-infrared light and cancer risk: what a systematic review found](https://cutislux.com/research/photobiomodulation-cancer-safety-review/): Systematic review, 2023, PMID 36722207 - [Red and amber LED light both reduced eye-wrinkle volume by about 30%](https://cutislux.com/research/red-vs-amber-light-eye-wrinkles/): Randomised split-face trial, 2023, PMID 36780572 - [A commercial three-wavelength LED mask tested on men](https://cutislux.com/research/633-830-1072-nm-led-mask-men/): Open-label study of a commercial mask, 2023, PMID 37418018 - [Low-level light therapy: a reasonable evidence base, with gaps](https://cutislux.com/research/photobiomodulation-clinical-applications-review/): Review, 2021, PMID 33471046 - [What 31 randomised trials say about LED light for skin](https://cutislux.com/research/led-dermatology-systematic-review/): Systematic review of 31 RCTs, 2018, PMID 29356026 - [What happens when sensitive skin meets a home fractional laser?](https://cutislux.com/research/sensitive-skin-home-fractional-laser/): Clinical study, sensitive vs non-sensitive skin, 2016, PMID 26875629 - [Does skincare change what a home fractional laser does?](https://cutislux.com/research/home-fractional-laser-with-antioxidants/): Randomised, evaluator-blinded, split-face, 2016, PMID 26727154 - [Home laser and light devices: what dermatologists found in the evidence](https://cutislux.com/research/home-laser-and-light-devices-review/): Literature and FDA database review, 2015, PMID 25705949 - [Red light increased collagen density against an untreated control](https://cutislux.com/research/red-light-collagen-density-136-people/): Randomised controlled trial, 2014, PMID 24286286 - [Can people safely use a fractional laser at home? A 124-person trial](https://cutislux.com/research/home-fractional-laser-multicenter-trial/): Multicentre trial, no control group, 2012, PMID 22386051 - [830 nm, 633 nm or both? A double-blind, sham-controlled LED trial](https://cutislux.com/research/633-830-nm-led-sham-controlled-split-face/): Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, split-face, 2007, PMID 17566756 - [The early clinic study behind red plus near-infrared LED masks](https://cutislux.com/research/633-830-nm-led-facial-rejuvenation/): Clinical study, no control group, 2005, PMID 16414908 - [Fractional photothermolysis: the 2004 study behind every fractional laser](https://cutislux.com/research/fractional-photothermolysis-original-study/): Prototype clinical study, 2004, PMID 15216537 - [Patients liked the result; only 2 of 25 dermatologists rated it better](https://cutislux.com/research/nonablative-laser-wrinkles-25-dermatologists/): Blinded photo evaluation, 2004, PMID 15149506 - [Is it the 1450 nm laser or just the cooling? A split-face test](https://cutislux.com/research/1450-nm-diode-laser-wrinkles-split-face/): Split-face comparison, 2002, PMID 11870784 - [Blue plus red light against acne: the classic randomised trial](https://cutislux.com/research/blue-and-red-light-acne-trial/): Randomised trial, observer-blinded, 2000, PMID 10809858 ## Reference - [Guide to specifications](https://cutislux.com/guide/) - [About and editorial policy](https://cutislux.com/about/) - Contact and corrections: contact@cutislux.com - [Full text for LLMs](https://cutislux.com/llms-full.txt) - [Device data JSON](https://cutislux.com/devices.json) · [CSV](https://cutislux.com/devices.csv) · [Research JSON](https://cutislux.com/research.json)