LYMA Laser vs MimiSilk Iris
LYMA Laser and MimiSilk Iris compared on published specifications. LYMA Laser is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes. LYMA Laser: 808 nm, session 3 min per area, £1,999. MimiSilk Iris: 1450 nm, session 5–10 min, €535.95.
Side by side
| LYMA Laser | MimiSilk Iris | |
|---|---|---|
| Type | Laser | Laser |
| Technology | Low-level (“cold”) laser | Non-ablative fractional laser |
| Wavelength | 808 nm | 1450 nm |
| Reported output | 500 mW continuous beam | Not found on checked page (minimum spot size 100 μm) |
| Form and coverage | Handheld wand, 8 cm² diffused lens | Handheld glide device, 5 facial zones, child lock |
| Session | 3 min per area | 5–10 min |
| Schedule (brand) | Daily for 12 weeks, then 3 times a week | 8 weeks on, 4 weeks off (brand comparison table) |
| Reference price | £1,999 | €535.95 |
| FDA 510(k) | K210823 Record names this device | K182498 Matched by model or device name |
Key differences
- Both are home lasers, but LYMA Laser is a low-level (“cold”) laser and MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser.
- Wavelengths: LYMA Laser 808 nm; MimiSilk Iris 1450 nm (none shared).
- Sessions: LYMA Laser 3 min per area; MimiSilk Iris 5–10 min.
- Reported output: LYMA Laser 500 mW continuous beam; MimiSilk Iris Not found on checked page (minimum spot size 100 μm).
- Reference price: LYMA Laser £1,999; MimiSilk Iris €535.95 (different currencies, not converted).
- FDA record: LYMA Laser K210823 (record names this device); MimiSilk Iris K182498 (matched by model or device name).
What the differences mean
LYMA Laser is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes.
A low-level laser emits coherent near-infrared light at power that does not heat tissue. It works by photobiomodulation: light absorbed by the cell’s mitochondria changes cell signalling, which studies link to collagen production. It shares this mechanism with LED masks but uses a laser source.
A non-ablative fractional laser fires a grid of microscopic heat columns, called microthermal treatment zones, into the dermis. The skin between the columns stays intact and heals each zone quickly, which drives collagen remodelling. Wavelengths around 1440–1550 nm are absorbed by water in the skin, so the effect does not depend on skin pigment.
LYMA Laser
LYMA brought low-level laser therapy into the luxury home market, and its FDA record names the Laser directly: a cordless 808 nm wand with a diffused lens that the brand says works without heat, pain or downtime.
Suited to: Preferring a non-thermal treatment with no expected downtime; Treating face, neck and small body areas.
MimiSilk Iris
MimiSilk brings fractional laser technology to a lower price point: the Iris is a 1450 nm non-ablative fractional device with five pre-set facial zones, a child lock and a design that has won product-design awards.
Suited to: Texture, pores and shallow acne marks (brand indications); Wanting fractional technology at a lower price.
Research matching both
- Home laser and light devices: what dermatologists found in the evidence Literature and FDA database review · 2015
Frequently asked questions
What is the main difference between LYMA Laser and MimiSilk Iris?
LYMA Laser is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes.
Which is cheaper, LYMA Laser or MimiSilk Iris?
Their reference prices are in different currencies (£1,999 and €535.95) and we do not convert them. Check current prices on the manufacturer pages.
Which has more research behind it?
Of the studies we explain, 3 match LYMA Laser’s technology and wavelengths and 7 match MimiSilk Iris’s. Matching studies did not necessarily test these models.