Cutis Lux

LYMA Laser PRO vs MimiSilk Iris

LYMA Laser PRO and MimiSilk Iris compared on published specifications. LYMA Laser PRO is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser PRO: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes. LYMA Laser PRO: 808 nm, session 3-min treatment cycle, £4,995. MimiSilk Iris: 1450 nm, session 5–10 min, €535.95.

Side by side

LYMA Laser PROMimiSilk Iris
TypeLaserLaser
TechnologyLow-level (“cold”) laserNon-ablative fractional laser
Wavelength808 nm1450 nm
Reported output1450 mW continuous beamNot found on checked page (minimum spot size 100 μm)
Form and coverageHandheld, 30 cm² diffused lensHandheld glide device, 5 facial zones, child lock
Session3-min treatment cycle5–10 min
Schedule (brand)Not found separately for PRO on checked page8 weeks on, 4 weeks off (brand comparison table)
Reference price£4,995€535.95
FDA 510(k)K243330
Record names this device
K182498
Matched by model or device name

Key differences

  • Both are home lasers, but LYMA Laser PRO is a low-level (“cold”) laser and MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser.
  • Wavelengths: LYMA Laser PRO 808 nm; MimiSilk Iris 1450 nm (none shared).
  • Sessions: LYMA Laser PRO 3-min treatment cycle; MimiSilk Iris 5–10 min.
  • Reported output: LYMA Laser PRO 1450 mW continuous beam; MimiSilk Iris Not found on checked page (minimum spot size 100 μm).
  • Reference price: LYMA Laser PRO £4,995; MimiSilk Iris €535.95 (different currencies, not converted).
  • FDA record: LYMA Laser PRO K243330 (record names this device); MimiSilk Iris K182498 (matched by model or device name).

What the differences mean

LYMA Laser PRO is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser PRO: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes.

A low-level laser emits coherent near-infrared light at power that does not heat tissue. It works by photobiomodulation: light absorbed by the cell’s mitochondria changes cell signalling, which studies link to collagen production. It shares this mechanism with LED masks but uses a laser source.

A non-ablative fractional laser fires a grid of microscopic heat columns, called microthermal treatment zones, into the dermis. The skin between the columns stays intact and heals each zone quickly, which drives collagen remodelling. Wavelengths around 1440–1550 nm are absorbed by water in the skin, so the effect does not depend on skin pigment.

LYMA Laser PRO

The LYMA Laser PRO has the highest published output of the five home lasers compared here: the same 808 nm cold-laser technology as the original, scaled to 1450 mW and a 30 cm² lens to cover larger areas of face and body faster.

Suited to: Covering larger areas per treatment cycle; Wanting the highest published output among the home lasers.

MimiSilk Iris

MimiSilk brings fractional laser technology to a lower price point: the Iris is a 1450 nm non-ablative fractional device with five pre-set facial zones, a child lock and a design that has won product-design awards.

Suited to: Texture, pores and shallow acne marks (brand indications); Wanting fractional technology at a lower price.

Research matching both

All home lasers compared

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between LYMA Laser PRO and MimiSilk Iris?

LYMA Laser PRO is a low-level (“cold”) laser; MimiSilk Iris is a non-ablative fractional laser. In use, LYMA Laser PRO: no heat; the brand reports no pain or downtime. MimiSilk Iris: warmth, prickling and short-lived redness are expected. They work in different ways, so they are not direct substitutes.

Which is cheaper, LYMA Laser PRO or MimiSilk Iris?

Their reference prices are in different currencies (£4,995 and €535.95) and we do not convert them. Check current prices on the manufacturer pages.

Which has more research behind it?

Of the studies we explain, 3 match LYMA Laser PRO’s technology and wavelengths and 7 match MimiSilk Iris’s. Matching studies did not necessarily test these models.