Cutis Lux

Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro vs Shark CryoGlow

Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro and Shark CryoGlow compared on published specifications. Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price. Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro: 415 · 630 nm, session 3 min, US$455. Shark CryoGlow: 415 · 630 · 830 nm, session Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source), US$349.99.

Side by side

Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare ProShark CryoGlow
TypeLEDLED
TechnologyLED light therapy maskLED light therapy mask
Wavelength415 · 630 nm415 · 630 · 830 nm
Reported outputNot found on checked pageNot found on checked page
Form and coverageFull-face rigid shell, 100 red + 60 blue lightsFull-face rigid shell with under-eye cooling, 160+ LEDs
Session3 minProgramme-dependent (8 min in baseline source)
Schedule (brand)Not found on checked pageNot found on checked page
Reference priceUS$455US$349.99
FDA 510(k)K183247
Possible match, unconfirmed
K242796
Record names this device

Key differences

  • Both are LED masks using LED light therapy mask.
  • Wavelengths: Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro 415 · 630 nm; Shark CryoGlow 415 · 630 · 830 nm (shared: 415, 630 nm).
  • Sessions: Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro 3 min; Shark CryoGlow Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source).
  • Reported output: Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro Not found on checked page; Shark CryoGlow Not found on checked page.
  • Reference price: Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro US$455; Shark CryoGlow US$349.99.
  • FDA record: Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro K183247 (possible match, unconfirmed); Shark CryoGlow K242796 (record names this device).

What the differences mean

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

An LED mask covers the face with many light-emitting diodes. The light is not intended to heat skin. Red and near-infrared light are studied for photobiomodulation, which may increase collagen; 415 nm blue light is studied for acne because it affects acne bacteria.

Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro

Dr. Dennis Gross Skincare is a dermatologist-founded brand, and the FaceWare Pro is built around speed: red and blue light in a three-minute session, the shortest listed treatment among all ten devices compared here.

Suited to: Wanting both red and blue light in one routine; Prioritising the shortest session time.

Shark CryoGlow

Shark brought mainstream engineering to LED masks: the CryoGlow combines blue, red and near-infrared light with a cooling under-eye panel no other device here offers, and its FDA record names the CryoGlow family directly.

Suited to: Wanting blue, red and near-infrared in one mask; Interest in under-eye cooling.

Research matching both

All LED masks compared

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro and Shark CryoGlow?

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

Which is cheaper, Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro or Shark CryoGlow?

By reference price, Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro lists US$455 and Shark CryoGlow US$349.99. Prices change; check the manufacturer pages.

Which has more research behind it?

Of the studies we explain, 9 match Dr. Dennis Gross FaceWare Pro’s technology and wavelengths and 11 match Shark CryoGlow’s. Matching studies did not necessarily test these models.