Cutis Lux

CurrentBody Series 3 vs Shark CryoGlow

CurrentBody Series 3 and Shark CryoGlow compared on published specifications. Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price. CurrentBody Series 3: 415 · 532 · 590 · 633 · 830 · 1072 nm, session 10 min, £499.99. Shark CryoGlow: 415 · 630 · 830 nm, session Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source), US$349.99.

Side by side

CurrentBody Series 3Shark CryoGlow
TypeLEDLED
TechnologyLED light therapy maskLED light therapy mask
Wavelength415 · 532 · 590 · 633 · 830 · 1072 nm415 · 630 · 830 nm
Reported outputNot found on checked pageNot found on checked page
Form and coverageFull-face flexible silicone mask with chin strap, 750 LEDsFull-face rigid shell with under-eye cooling, 160+ LEDs
Session10 minProgramme-dependent (8 min in baseline source)
Schedule (brand)Four presets plus app-customised treatments; frequency not found on checked pageNot found on checked page
Reference price£499.99US$349.99
FDA 510(k)K260715
Possible match, unconfirmed
K242796
Record names this device

Key differences

  • Both are LED masks using LED light therapy mask.
  • Wavelengths: CurrentBody Series 3 415 · 532 · 590 · 633 · 830 · 1072 nm; Shark CryoGlow 415 · 630 · 830 nm (shared: 415, 830 nm).
  • Sessions: CurrentBody Series 3 10 min; Shark CryoGlow Programme-dependent (8 min in baseline source).
  • Reported output: CurrentBody Series 3 Not found on checked page; Shark CryoGlow Not found on checked page.
  • Reference price: CurrentBody Series 3 £499.99; Shark CryoGlow US$349.99 (different currencies, not converted).
  • FDA record: CurrentBody Series 3 K260715 (possible match, unconfirmed); Shark CryoGlow K242796 (record names this device).

What the differences mean

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

An LED mask covers the face with many light-emitting diodes. The light is not intended to heat skin. Red and near-infrared light are studied for photobiomodulation, which may increase collagen; 415 nm blue light is studied for acne because it affects acne bacteria.

CurrentBody Series 3

CurrentBody is a well-known name in at-home beauty technology, and Series 3 is its most comprehensive mask yet: six wavelengths from blue to deep near-infrared, 750 LEDs and app-customised sessions in a soft silicone design.

Suited to: Wanting one mask that spans blue, green, amber, red and near-infrared; Preferring a flexible fit over a rigid shell.

Shark CryoGlow

Shark brought mainstream engineering to LED masks: the CryoGlow combines blue, red and near-infrared light with a cooling under-eye panel no other device here offers, and its FDA record names the CryoGlow family directly.

Suited to: Wanting blue, red and near-infrared in one mask; Interest in under-eye cooling.

Research matching both

All LED masks compared

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between CurrentBody Series 3 and Shark CryoGlow?

Both use the same technology (LED light therapy mask), so the differences are in wavelengths, output, form, routine and price.

Which is cheaper, CurrentBody Series 3 or Shark CryoGlow?

Their reference prices are in different currencies (£499.99 and US$349.99) and we do not convert them. Check current prices on the manufacturer pages.

Which has more research behind it?

Of the studies we explain, 12 match CurrentBody Series 3’s technology and wavelengths and 11 match Shark CryoGlow’s. Matching studies did not necessarily test these models.